[MINOR][DOCS] Typo fix in cloud-integration.md

[fishmandev]

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Typo fix

Why are the changes needed?

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

How was this patch tested?

[HyukjinKwon]

@fishmandev, let's make sure filling PR description although this is trivial change. While we're here, mind checking if there are more typos to fix around here?

Also, Github Actions in your forked repository should be enable to run CI, see also https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34129/checks?check_run_id=3733907992

[fishmandev]

Also, Github Actions in your forked repository should be enable to run CI

Done it.

While we're here, mind checking if there are more typos to fix around here?

I have a question regarding this part of the text:
In order to store hundreds of petabytes of data without any single points of failure, object stores replace the classic file system directory tree with a simpler model of `object-name => data`.

Why is the plural used for 'SPOF' in this context? Or is it a typo?
... without any single point of failure, ...

@HyukjinKwon, what do you think about it?

[srowen]

Either works, to my ear. There is not one SPOF, there are not multiple SPOFs => there are none

[srowen]

Jenkins test this please

[SparkQA]

Test build #143785 has finished for PR 34129 at commit 7e6ca38.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[SparkQA]

Kubernetes integration test starting
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/48297/

[SparkQA]

Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/48297/

[srowen]

Merged to master