[MINOR][SQL] Remove duplicate code for AggregateExpression.isAggregate usage#36886
Closed
wangyum wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[MINOR][SQL] Remove duplicate code for AggregateExpression.isAggregate usage#36886wangyum wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
AggregateExpression.isAggregate usage#36886wangyum wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
wangyum
commented
Jun 16, 2022
Comment on lines
-305
to
-307
| def isAggregateExpression(expr: Expression): Boolean = { | ||
| expr.isInstanceOf[AggregateExpression] || PythonUDF.isGroupedAggPandasUDF(expr) | ||
| } |
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
huaxingao
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2022
Contributor
|
Merged to master. Thanks @wangyum |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove duplicate code for
AggregateExpression.isAggregateusage.Why are the changes needed?
Make the code easier to maintain.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.