[SPARK-39718][INFRA] Add name for infra-image and cleanup nits#37131
Closed
Yikun wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[SPARK-39718][INFRA] Add name for infra-image and cleanup nits#37131Yikun wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Yikun wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
Yikun
changed the title
Yikun
commented
Jul 8, 2022
Comment on lines
36
to
37
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| with: | |
| fetch-depth: 0 |
This should be remove, now only checkout the master branch. Will add branches infra image later, I think
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2022
Member
|
Merged to master. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add name for infra-image and cleanup nits and fix the inline format
Why are the changes needed?
Address comments in #37005 (comment)
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
CI passed