[SPARK-34265][SQL][TESTS][FOLLOW-UP] Add assume for PythonUDF test case in Scala side#38407
Closed
HyukjinKwon wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[SPARK-34265][SQL][TESTS][FOLLOW-UP] Add assume for PythonUDF test case in Scala side#38407HyukjinKwon wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
HyukjinKwon wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
zhengruifeng
approved these changes
Oct 27, 2022
Member
Author
|
Merged to master. |
SandishKumarHN
pushed a commit
to SandishKumarHN/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2022
…se in Scala side ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR adds `assume` in the Python test added in apache#33559. ### Why are the changes needed? In some testing environment, Python does not exist. This is consistent with other tests in this file. Otherwise, it'd fails as below: ``` java.lang.RuntimeException: Python availability: [true], pyspark availability: [false] at org.apache.spark.sql.IntegratedUDFTestUtils$.pythonFunc$lzycompute(IntegratedUDFTestUtils.scala:192) at org.apache.spark.sql.IntegratedUDFTestUtils$.org$apache$spark$sql$IntegratedUDFTestUtils$$pythonFunc(IntegratedUDFTestUtils.scala:172) at org.apache.spark.sql.IntegratedUDFTestUtils$TestPythonUDF$$anon$1.<init>(IntegratedUDFTestUtils.scala:337) at org.apache.spark.sql.IntegratedUDFTestUtils$TestPythonUDF.udf$lzycompute(IntegratedUDFTestUtils.scala:334) at org.apache.spark.sql.IntegratedUDFTestUtils$TestPythonUDF.udf(IntegratedUDFTestUtils.scala:334) at org.apache.spark.sql.IntegratedUDFTestUtils$TestPythonUDF.apply(IntegratedUDFTestUtils.scala:359) at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.python.PythonUDFSuite.$anonfun$new$11(PythonUDFSuite.scala:105) ... ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, test-only. ### How was this patch tested? Manually checked. Closes apache#38407 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34265. Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds
assumein the Python test added in #33559.Why are the changes needed?
In some testing environment, Python does not exist. This is consistent with other tests in this file. Otherwise, it'd fails as below:
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No, test-only.
How was this patch tested?
Manually checked.