Skip to content

Conversation

@jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 22, 2015

Test build #25939 has started for PR 4154 at commit a91f295.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 22, 2015

Test build #25939 has finished for PR 4154 at commit a91f295.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25939/
Test FAILed.

@jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jenkins, retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 22, 2015

Test build #25942 has started for PR 4154 at commit a91f295.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 22, 2015

Test build #25942 has finished for PR 4154 at commit a91f295.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25942/
Test FAILed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 22, 2015

Test build #25945 has started for PR 4154 at commit a4b2bea.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 22, 2015

Test build #25945 has finished for PR 4154 at commit a4b2bea.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25945/
Test FAILed.

@jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor Author

Quite strange the test is OK in my local test but failed in Jenkins.

@jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jenkins, retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 22, 2015

Test build #25954 has started for PR 4154 at commit a4b2bea.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 22, 2015

Test build #25954 has finished for PR 4154 at commit a4b2bea.

  • This patch fails to build.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25954/
Test FAILed.

@jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jenkins, retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 26, 2015

Test build #26074 has started for PR 4154 at commit a4b2bea.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 26, 2015

Test build #26074 has finished for PR 4154 at commit a4b2bea.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26074/
Test PASSed.

@jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @pwendell , would you mind taking a look at this backport PR, thanks a lot.

@tdas
Copy link
Contributor

tdas commented Jan 28, 2015

@jerryshao We generally dont make binary compatibility changes within patch releases. So I dont think this is a good idea. If there is a way this fix can be made without breaking binary compatibility, I can consider merging.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Feb 27, 2015

@jerryshao Given the comment from @tdas, let's close this PR and not merge this change into 1.2.x. I think that's prudent.

@jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, I will close this PR, thanks a lot for your comments.

@jerryshao jerryshao closed this Feb 27, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants