[SPARK-30848][SQL] Remove productHash from TreeNode

[panbingkun]

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The pr aims to replace TreeNode.productHash with MurmurHash3.productHash.

Why are the changes needed?

1.Spark 4.0 no longer supports Scala 2.12.

2.Using MurmurHash3's class method productHash to reduce code redundancy.
https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/v2.13.11/src/library/scala/util/hashing/MurmurHash3.scala#L343
https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/v2.13.11/src/library/scala/util/hashing/MurmurHash3.scala#L64-L81

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

1.Pass GA.
2.Manually test:

(base) panbingkun:~/Developer/spark/spark-community$./build/sbt "catalyst/testOnly org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.CanonicalizeSuite -- -t \"SPARK-30847: Take productPrefix into account in MurmurHash3.productHash\""

[info] CanonicalizeSuite:
[info] - SPARK-30847: Take productPrefix into account in MurmurHash3.productHash (249 milliseconds)
[info] Run completed in 1 second, 135 milliseconds.
[info] Total number of tests run: 1
[info] Suites: completed 1, aborted 0
[info] Tests: succeeded 1, failed 0, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
[info] All tests passed.
[success] Total time: 230 s (03:50), completed Sep 28, 2023, 12:54:06 PM

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

[LuciferYang]

cc @HyukjinKwon FYI

[LuciferYang]

@panbingkun Could you resolve the conflict?

[panbingkun]

@panbingkun Could you resolve the conflict?

@LuciferYang Done.

[beliefer]

Looks good.

[HyukjinKwon]

You can use https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30848 JIRA :-).

[panbingkun]

Yeah, I was looking for this PR to learn about history. Thank you for the good record at that time! haha

[LuciferYang]

+1, LGTM