[SPARK-46208][PS][DOCS] Adding a link for latest Pandas API specifications.#44115
Closed
itholic wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
[SPARK-46208][PS][DOCS] Adding a link for latest Pandas API specifications.#44115itholic wants to merge 2 commits into
itholic wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Contributor
Author
itholic
commented
Dec 2, 2023
| This page gives an overview of all public pandas API on Spark. | ||
|
|
||
| .. note:: | ||
| pandas API on Spark follows the API specifications of latest pandas release. |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I believe we cannot always support the latest pandas version in some cases, especially when they introduce the breaking changes.
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should just keep it as is for now. It's a bit of overhead to keep changing this monthly
dongjoon-hyun
requested changes
Dec 2, 2023
Contributor
Author
|
Sounds reasonable to me. Let me just close this ticket. |
itholic
commented
Dec 3, 2023
dongjoon-hyun
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2023
Co-authored-by: Haejoon Lee <44108233+itholic@users.noreply.github.com>
dongjoon-hyun
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2023
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2023
Member
|
Merged to master. |
asl3
pushed a commit
to asl3/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
…tions ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR proposes to adding a link for latest Pandas API specifications. ### Why are the changes needed? To increase the usability of documents ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? The existing CI should pass ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#44115 from itholic/use_exact_pandas_version. Lead-authored-by: Haejoon Lee <haejoon.lee@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
dbatomic
pushed a commit
to dbatomic/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2023
…tions ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR proposes to adding a link for latest Pandas API specifications. ### Why are the changes needed? To increase the usability of documents ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? The existing CI should pass ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#44115 from itholic/use_exact_pandas_version. Lead-authored-by: Haejoon Lee <haejoon.lee@databricks.com> Co-authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to adding a link for latest Pandas API specifications.
Why are the changes needed?
To increase the usability of documents
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
The existing CI should pass
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.