Skip to content

[SPARK-47115][INFRA][FOLLOW-UP] Use larger runner for Maven build (macos-14-large)#45211

Closed
HyukjinKwon wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
HyukjinKwon:SPARK-47115-followup
Closed

[SPARK-47115][INFRA][FOLLOW-UP] Use larger runner for Maven build (macos-14-large)#45211
HyukjinKwon wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
HyukjinKwon:SPARK-47115-followup

Conversation

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR addresses #45195 (review) by using larger runner.
However, I do not change the memory at .github/workflows/maven_test.yml because that is shared by other standard runners.

We're using GitHub Enterprise so this runners are available.

Why are the changes needed?

It still fails https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/7994847558. My speculation is that it relates to the resources available.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No, dev-only.

How was this patch tested?

Will monitor the scheduled jobs.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the INFRA label Feb 22, 2024
@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry @dongjoon-hyun it's my bad. I think we should better use a larger runner.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

No problem at all. It was a nice try to validate all combinations, @HyukjinKwon :)

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM.

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun changed the title [SPARK-47115][INFRA][FOLLOW-UP] Use larger runner for Maven build (macos-14) [SPARK-47115][INFRA][FOLLOW-UP] Use larger runner for Maven build (macos-14-large) Feb 22, 2024
@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Merged to master~

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

Screenshot 2024-02-23 at 8 01 20 AM
Hm... let me revert this for now.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Thank you for reverting.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Are we going to revert the original, #45195 ? 6g seems to be too much.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member Author

Sure will do ...

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon reopened this Feb 23, 2024
ericm-db pushed a commit to ericm-db/spark that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2024
…cos-14-large)

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR addresses apache#45195 (review) by using larger runner.
However, I do not change the memory at `.github/workflows/maven_test.yml` because that is shared by other standard runners.

We're using GitHub Enterprise so this runners are available.

### Why are the changes needed?

It still fails https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/7994847558. My speculation is that it relates to the resources available.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, dev-only.

### How was this patch tested?

Will monitor the scheduled jobs.

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

Closes apache#45211 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-47115-followup.

Authored-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants