[SPARK-48540][CORE] Avoid ivy output loading settings to stdout#46882
Closed
cxzl25 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[SPARK-48540][CORE] Avoid ivy output loading settings to stdout#46882cxzl25 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
cxzl25 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@LuciferYang @yaooqinn Please help review, thanks in advance! |
yaooqinn
approved these changes
Jun 6, 2024
Member
|
Merged to master. Thank you @cxzl25 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to avoid ivy output loading settings to stdout.
Why are the changes needed?
Now
org.apache.spark.util.MavenUtils#getModuleDescriptorwill output the following string to stdout.This is due to the modified code order in SPARK-32596 .
Stack trace
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
local test
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No