[SPARK-47172][CORE][3.5] Add support for AES-GCM for RPC encryption#47060
Closed
sweisdb wants to merge 3 commits into
Closed
[SPARK-47172][CORE][3.5] Add support for AES-GCM for RPC encryption#47060sweisdb wants to merge 3 commits into
sweisdb wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
This change adds AES-GCM as an optional AES cipher mode for RPC encryption. The current default is using AES-CTR without any authentication. That would allow someone on the network to easily modify RPC contents on the wire and impact Spark behavior. See [SPARK-47172](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47172) for more details. The current default is using AES-CTR without any authentication. That would allow someone on the network to easily modify RPC contents on the wire and impact Spark behavior. Yes, it adds an additional configuration flag is reflected in the documentation. Existing unit tests are all ensured to pass. New unit tests are written to explicitly test GCM support and to verify that modifying ciphertext content will cause an exception and fail. `build/sbt "network-common/test:testOnly"` `build/sbt "network-common/test:testOnly org.apache.spark.network.crypto.AuthIntegrationSuite"` `build/sbt "network-common/test:testOnly org.apache.spark.network.crypto.AuthEngineSuite"` Nope. Closes apache#46515 from sweisdb/SPARK-47172. Authored-by: Steve Weis <steve.weis@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Yi Wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Member
@HyukjinKwon Do you know how to reslove such breaking check failure? Note the breaking change is not introduced by this PR. |
Member
|
we can ignore it for now |
Ngone51
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This change adds AES-GCM as an optional AES cipher mode for RPC encryption. The current default is using AES-CTR without any authentication. That would allow someone on the network to easily modify RPC contents on the wire and impact Spark behavior. See [SPARK-47172](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47172) for more details. ### Why are the changes needed? The current default is using AES-CTR without any authentication. That would allow someone on the network to easily modify RPC contents on the wire and impact Spark behavior. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, it adds an additional configuration flag is reflected in the documentation. ### How was this patch tested? Existing unit tests are all ensured to pass. New unit tests are written to explicitly test GCM support and to verify that modifying ciphertext content will cause an exception and fail. `build/sbt "network-common/test:testOnly"` `build/sbt "network-common/test:testOnly org.apache.spark.network.crypto.AuthIntegrationSuite"` `build/sbt "network-common/test:testOnly org.apache.spark.network.crypto.AuthEngineSuite"` ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? Nope. Closes #47060 from sweisdb/SPARK-47172-3.5. Authored-by: Steve Weis <steve.weis@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Yi Wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
Member
|
Thanks, merged to branch-3.5. |
sunchao
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2026
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This change adds AES-GCM as an optional AES cipher mode for RPC encryption. The current default is using AES-CTR without any authentication. That would allow someone on the network to easily modify RPC contents on the wire and impact Spark behavior. See [SPARK-47172](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47172) for more details. ### Why are the changes needed? The current default is using AES-CTR without any authentication. That would allow someone on the network to easily modify RPC contents on the wire and impact Spark behavior. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, it adds an additional configuration flag is reflected in the documentation. ### How was this patch tested? Existing unit tests are all ensured to pass. New unit tests are written to explicitly test GCM support and to verify that modifying ciphertext content will cause an exception and fail. `build/sbt "network-common/test:testOnly"` `build/sbt "network-common/test:testOnly org.apache.spark.network.crypto.AuthIntegrationSuite"` `build/sbt "network-common/test:testOnly org.apache.spark.network.crypto.AuthEngineSuite"` ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? Nope. Closes #47060 from sweisdb/SPARK-47172-3.5. Authored-by: Steve Weis <steve.weis@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Yi Wu <yi.wu@databricks.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This change adds AES-GCM as an optional AES cipher mode for RPC encryption. The current default is using AES-CTR without any authentication. That would allow someone on the network to easily modify RPC contents on the wire and impact Spark behavior. See SPARK-47172 for more details.
Why are the changes needed?
The current default is using AES-CTR without any authentication. That would allow someone on the network to easily modify RPC contents on the wire and impact Spark behavior.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, it adds an additional configuration flag is reflected in the documentation.
How was this patch tested?
Existing unit tests are all ensured to pass. New unit tests are written to explicitly test GCM support and to verify that modifying ciphertext content will cause an exception and fail.
build/sbt "network-common/test:testOnly"build/sbt "network-common/test:testOnly org.apache.spark.network.crypto.AuthIntegrationSuite"build/sbt "network-common/test:testOnly org.apache.spark.network.crypto.AuthEngineSuite"Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
Nope.