Skip to content

[SPARK-49521][DOCS] Remove the ambiguous term “constructor” from the documentation for logical plan nodes#47999

Closed
xinrong-meng wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
xinrong-meng:doc_impr
Closed

[SPARK-49521][DOCS] Remove the ambiguous term “constructor” from the documentation for logical plan nodes#47999
xinrong-meng wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
xinrong-meng:doc_impr

Conversation

@xinrong-meng
Copy link
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

There are three uses of "constructor" in the documentation for logical plan nodes, which are confusing due to their overlap in meaning with Scala constructors.

Why are the changes needed?

For clearer documentation without ambiguity.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

Doc changes only.

How was this patch tested?

Existing tests.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

@github-actions github-actions bot added SQL and removed DOCS labels Sep 5, 2024
@xinrong-meng
Copy link
Member Author

The PR resolves the concern here, @cloud-fan would you please review?

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM. Thank you, @xinrong-meng and all.

Merged to master.

@xinrong-meng
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you @dongjoon-hyun and all!

@xinrong-meng xinrong-meng deleted the doc_impr branch September 6, 2024 07:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants