[SPARK-50789][CONNECT] The inputs for typed aggregations should be analyzed#49449
Closed
ueshin wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[SPARK-50789][CONNECT] The inputs for typed aggregations should be analyzed#49449ueshin wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
ueshin wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
cloud-fan
approved these changes
Jan 13, 2025
Member
Author
|
The remaining test failures are not related to this PR. |
Member
Author
|
Thanks! merging to master. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fixes
SparkConnectPlannerto analyze the inputs for typed aggregations.Why are the changes needed?
The inputs for typed aggregations should be analyzed.
For example:
fails with:
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
The failure will not appear.
How was this patch tested?
Added the related tests.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.