[SPARK-50960][PYTHON][CONNECT] Add InvalidPlanInput to Spark Connect Python client
#49616
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
zhengruifeng
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2025
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2025
Member
|
Merged to master and branch-4.0. |
HyukjinKwon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2025
…t Python client ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR proposes to add `InvalidPlanInput` to Spark Connect Python client. ### Why are the changes needed? To keep the consistency with Spark Connect Scala client. We should capture the `SparkConnectGrpcException` more generally across all clients. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No API changes, but the user-facing error message would keep consistency with Spark Connect Scala client. ### How was this patch tested? Updated the existing UT. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes #49616 from itholic/invalid_input. Authored-by: Haejoon Lee <haejoon.lee@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit f749742) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
zifeif2
pushed a commit
to zifeif2/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2025
…t Python client ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR proposes to add `InvalidPlanInput` to Spark Connect Python client. ### Why are the changes needed? To keep the consistency with Spark Connect Scala client. We should capture the `SparkConnectGrpcException` more generally across all clients. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No API changes, but the user-facing error message would keep consistency with Spark Connect Scala client. ### How was this patch tested? Updated the existing UT. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#49616 from itholic/invalid_input. Authored-by: Haejoon Lee <haejoon.lee@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit f4d0e12) Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add
InvalidPlanInputto Spark Connect Python client.Why are the changes needed?
To keep the consistency with Spark Connect Scala client. We should capture the
SparkConnectGrpcExceptionmore generally across all clients.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No API changes, but the user-facing error message would keep consistency with Spark Connect Scala client.
How was this patch tested?
Updated the existing UT.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.