Skip to content

Conversation

@anishshri-db
Copy link
Contributor

@anishshri-db anishshri-db commented Jan 31, 2025

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add tests to verify scan ordering for non-zero start ordinals as well as non-ascending ordinals

Why are the changes needed?

Improve coverage in this area

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

Test only change

[info] Run completed in 8 minutes, 33 seconds.
[info] Total number of tests run: 1032
[info] Suites: completed 1, aborted 0
[info] Tests: succeeded 1032, failed 0, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
[info] All tests passed.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No

@anishshri-db anishshri-db changed the title [SPARK-51047] Add tests to verify scan ordering for non-zero start ordinals as well as non-ascending ordinals [SPARK-51047][SS] Add tests to verify scan ordering for non-zero start ordinals as well as non-ascending ordinals Jan 31, 2025
@anishshri-db
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc - @HeartSaVioR - PTAL, thx !

Copy link
Contributor

@HeartSaVioR HeartSaVioR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good in overall. Only nits.

@HeartSaVioR HeartSaVioR changed the title [SPARK-51047][SS] Add tests to verify scan ordering for non-zero start ordinals as well as non-ascending ordinals [SPARK-51047][SS][TESTS] Add tests to verify scan ordering for non-zero start ordinals as well as non-ascending ordinals Feb 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@HeartSaVioR HeartSaVioR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@HeartSaVioR
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks! Merging to master/4.0.

HeartSaVioR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2025
…ro start ordinals as well as non-ascending ordinals

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add tests to verify scan ordering for non-zero start ordinals as well as non-ascending ordinals

### Why are the changes needed?
Improve coverage in this area

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Test only change

```
[info] Run completed in 8 minutes, 33 seconds.
[info] Total number of tests run: 1032
[info] Suites: completed 1, aborted 0
[info] Tests: succeeded 1032, failed 0, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
[info] All tests passed.
```

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No

Closes #49747 from anishshri-db/task/SPARK-51047.

Authored-by: Anish Shrigondekar <anish.shrigondekar@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5cd25fc)
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
zifeif2 pushed a commit to zifeif2/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2025
…ro start ordinals as well as non-ascending ordinals

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add tests to verify scan ordering for non-zero start ordinals as well as non-ascending ordinals

### Why are the changes needed?
Improve coverage in this area

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Test only change

```
[info] Run completed in 8 minutes, 33 seconds.
[info] Total number of tests run: 1032
[info] Suites: completed 1, aborted 0
[info] Tests: succeeded 1032, failed 0, canceled 0, ignored 0, pending 0
[info] All tests passed.
```

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No

Closes apache#49747 from anishshri-db/task/SPARK-51047.

Authored-by: Anish Shrigondekar <anish.shrigondekar@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 48075c3)
Signed-off-by: Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensource@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants