[SPARK-50265][CONNECT] Support spark.udf.registerJavaUdf in Connect#49759
Closed
hvanhovell wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[SPARK-50265][CONNECT] Support spark.udf.registerJavaUdf in Connect#49759hvanhovell wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
hvanhovell wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Merging to master/4.0. |
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2025
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR adds support for `UDFRegistration.registerJavaUdf(..)` to the Connect Scala Client. ### Why are the changes needed? This increase compatibility between the Classic and Connect implementations. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes. It enables Scala client users to use `UDFRegistration.registerJavaUdf(..)`. ### How was this patch tested? I have added a Unit tests to the `UserDefinedFunctionE2ETestSuite`. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? Closes #49759 from hvanhovell/SPARK-50265. Authored-by: Herman van Hovell <herman@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <herman@databricks.com> (cherry picked from commit bf442c5) Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <herman@databricks.com>
zifeif2
pushed a commit
to zifeif2/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2025
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR adds support for `UDFRegistration.registerJavaUdf(..)` to the Connect Scala Client. ### Why are the changes needed? This increase compatibility between the Classic and Connect implementations. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes. It enables Scala client users to use `UDFRegistration.registerJavaUdf(..)`. ### How was this patch tested? I have added a Unit tests to the `UserDefinedFunctionE2ETestSuite`. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? Closes apache#49759 from hvanhovell/SPARK-50265. Authored-by: Herman van Hovell <herman@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <herman@databricks.com> (cherry picked from commit f0dbe48) Signed-off-by: Herman van Hovell <herman@databricks.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds support for
UDFRegistration.registerJavaUdf(..)to the Connect Scala Client.Why are the changes needed?
This increase compatibility between the Classic and Connect implementations.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes. It enables Scala client users to use
UDFRegistration.registerJavaUdf(..).How was this patch tested?
I have added a Unit tests to the
UserDefinedFunctionE2ETestSuite.Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?