[MINOR][SQL][DOCS] Improve the SQL example for join strategy#50359
Closed
beliefer wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
[MINOR][SQL][DOCS] Improve the SQL example for join strategy#50359beliefer wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
beliefer wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
Mar 24, 2025
Contributor
|
Merged into master for Apache Spark 4.1.0. Thanks @beliefer and @HyukjinKwon |
Contributor
Author
|
@LuciferYang @HyukjinKwon Thank you! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to improve the SQL example for join strategy.
Why are the changes needed?
The SQL example for join strategy confuses users as if the join strategy is related to the join order. This PR makes consistent join order for all the examples.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
'No'.
Just docs.
How was this patch tested?
No need.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.