Revert "[SPARK-49872][CORE] allow unlimited json size again"#52036
Closed
cloud-fan wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
Revert "[SPARK-49872][CORE] allow unlimited json size again"#52036cloud-fan wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
cloud-fan wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
This reverts commit cc7f88b.
Contributor
Author
LuciferYang
approved these changes
Aug 15, 2025
Member
|
Merged to master. Thank you, @cloud-fan . Please proceed to the next steps for all live branches. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
A clean revert of #49163 . We will make a surgical fix that can be backported to older branches.
Why are the changes needed?
this fix is too large to backport.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no, it's not released yet.
How was this patch tested?
existing tests
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
no