Skip to content

Conversation

@LuciferYang
Copy link
Contributor

@LuciferYang LuciferYang commented Nov 17, 2025

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This pr aims to upgrade icu4j from 77.1 to 78.1.

Why are the changes needed?

The full release notes as follows:

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

Pass Github Actions

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No

@LuciferYang LuciferYang marked this pull request as draft November 17, 2025 09:01
@github-actions github-actions bot added the BUILD label Nov 17, 2025
@LuciferYang
Copy link
Contributor Author

https://icu.unicode.org/

@github-actions github-actions bot added the SQL label Nov 17, 2025
@LuciferYang LuciferYang changed the title Test icu4j 78.1 [SPARK-54447][BUILD] Upgrade icu4j to 78.1 Nov 21, 2025
@LuciferYang LuciferYang marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2025 04:09
Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM for Apache Spark 4.2.0. Thank you, @LuciferYang .

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Merged to master.

@LuciferYang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you @dongjoon-hyun

huangxiaopingRD pushed a commit to huangxiaopingRD/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2025
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr aims to upgrade icu4j from 77.1 to 78.1.

### Why are the changes needed?
The full release notes as follows:
- https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/releases/tag/release-78.1
- https://unicode-org.github.io/icu/download/78.html

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Pass Github Actions

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No

Closes apache#53092 from LuciferYang/icu-78.1.

Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants