[SPARK-57082][INFRA] Remove master tag from workflow names#56123
Closed
gaogaotiantian wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
[SPARK-57082][INFRA] Remove master tag from workflow names#56123gaogaotiantian wants to merge 1 commit into
gaogaotiantian wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
HyukjinKwon
approved these changes
May 27, 2026
Member
|
Merged to master. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For all workflows, remove the "master" label. Leaving only what environment/features the workflow is about.
Why are the changes needed?
We are moving toward a CI structure where we organize different branch CIs based on branches. So the workflow file with the same name on different branches should trigger the CI on those specific branches. When master/branch-4.x is forked, we don't want the name to contain "master" because it's not anymore. We don't want to change that every time we cut branch because that's kind of meaningless.
Practically, we added that name to differentiate branches on action tab - now we should use the branch filter, which is more meaningful.
We also added that name to be displayed on README file - that won't work anymore because we are using the "same" workflow file (file with the same name in different branches) and only the one on master dictates the display name on icons (unless we use 3rd party icon, which is doable and we only need change README file). I think it's fine because we already have a table with the branch tag on the left.
This will save us some renaming time every time we cut branches.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
No code change.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.