Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 10, 2024. It is now read-only.

SUBMARINE-524. Add travis test of commons-unixusersync#309

Closed
Eroschang wants to merge 5 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Eroschang:SUBMARINE-524
Closed

SUBMARINE-524. Add travis test of commons-unixusersync#309
Eroschang wants to merge 5 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Eroschang:SUBMARINE-524

Conversation

@Eroschang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What is this PR for?

To test the module of commons-unixusersync.

What type of PR is it?

Improvement

Todos

  • - Task

What is the Jira issue?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUBMARINE-524

How should this be tested?

https://travis-ci.org/github/Eroschang/submarine

Screenshots (if appropriate)

image

Questions:

  • Does the licenses files need update? No
  • Is there breaking changes for older versions? No
  • Does this needs documentation? No

@tangzhankun
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Eroschang Thanks for the contribution. One doubt, why the commons-unixusersync only have test cases now? Do we need nny other utilities of LDAP APIs?

@xunliu xunliu changed the title SUBMARINE-524. Add travis test of commons-unixusersync. SUBMARINE-524. Add travis test of commons-unixusersync Jun 13, 2020
@xunliu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

xunliu commented Jun 13, 2020

@Eroschang Thanks for the contribution. One doubt, why the commons-unixusersync only have test cases now? Do we need nny other utilities of LDAP APIs?

Because synchronous ldap can be achieved through the ranger's exist modules,
But now I and @Eroschang don't know where to put the functions of commons-unixusersync, so I have a separate module.

We have implemented the function first in this way, and we can easily adjust it when the requirements are clarified later.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@xunliu xunliu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Will merge if no more comments.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in f9483dd Jun 16, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants