chore: upgrade postgresql to 42.7.10 due to CVE

[pjfanning]

What changes were proposed in this PR?

CVE-2025-49146 affects 42.7.4 which is used in various places

Any related issues, documentation, discussions?

How was this PR tested?

Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

[Yicong-Huang]

@aglinxinyuan @bobbai00 do we need this in for 1.1?

[aglinxinyuan]

@aglinxinyuan @bobbai00 do we need this in for 1.1?

It's not required, but we can still proceed with the upgrade. We can merge it after merging those test PRs, such that the testing will be easier.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 42.23%. Comparing base (b9c899f) to head (a4a1987).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #4420   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     42.22%   42.23%           
  Complexity     2180     2180           
=========================================
  Files           980      980           
  Lines         36287    36287           
  Branches       3783     3783           
=========================================
+ Hits          15321    15324    +3     
+ Misses        20037    20036    -1     
+ Partials        929      927    -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
access-control-service	39.53% <ø> (ø)
amber	43.14% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
computing-unit-managing-service	0.00% <ø> (ø)
config-service	0.00% <ø> (ø)
file-service	33.24% <ø> (ø)
workflow-compiling-service	47.72% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[pjfanning]

Closing. There is an issue that needs investigation and I think I'll need to leave it to the Texera team to do this.

https://github.com/apache/texera/actions/runs/25405045722/job/74514056705

[pjfanning]

ok - this set of changes seems to be getting further in the build

[bobbai00]

LGTM! Thank you very much for this effort @pjfanning