Skip to content

chore: drop labels: ["triage"] from issue templates#4918

Merged
aglinxinyuan merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Yicong-Huang:ci-issue-templates-no-triage
May 4, 2026
Merged

chore: drop labels: ["triage"] from issue templates#4918
aglinxinyuan merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
Yicong-Huang:ci-issue-templates-no-triage

Conversation

@Yicong-Huang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this PR?

Follow-up to PR #4899, which retired the triage label workflow in favor of the search filter is:issue is:open no:assignee. The three issue templates still carried labels: ["triage"] at the top, so every new issue opened via the templates re-acquired the label even though no workflow consumes it anymore.

Drop the line in bug-template.yaml, task-template.yaml, and feature-template.yaml (one line each).

Any related issues, documentation, discussions?

Closes #4917. Sequel to #4899.

After this lands, the triage label itself can be deleted from the repo:

gh api -X DELETE /repos/apache/texera/labels/triage

That removes the chip from every issue that still carries it.

How was this PR tested?

YAML parse on all three templates. Behavior verifiable post-merge by opening a new issue from any template and confirming no triage label is attached.

Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

Generated-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context)

PR apache#4899 retired the `triage` label workflow in favor of the search
filter `is:issue is:open no:assignee`. New issues opened from the bug,
task, or feature templates were still attaching `triage` automatically
because each template carried `labels: ["triage"]` at the top.

Drop the line in all three templates so newly opened issues match the
no-assignee filter directly. Existing issues that already carry the
label are unaffected by this change; they will be cleaned up by a
one-shot label deletion after this lands.
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the ci changes related to CI label May 4, 2026
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented May 4, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 42.03%. Comparing base (07d8311) to head (8771af3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #4918      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     42.04%   42.03%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity     2156     2154       -2     
============================================
  Files           980      980              
  Lines         36292    36292              
  Branches       3783     3783              
============================================
- Hits          15258    15256       -2     
+ Misses        20112    20110       -2     
- Partials        922      926       +4     
Flag Coverage Δ
access-control-service 39.53% <ø> (ø)
agent-service 33.72% <ø> (ø)
amber 42.84% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
computing-unit-managing-service 0.00% <ø> (ø)
config-service 0.00% <ø> (ø)
file-service 33.24% <ø> (ø)
frontend 30.50% <ø> (ø)
python 87.41% <ø> (ø)
workflow-compiling-service 47.72% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@aglinxinyuan aglinxinyuan merged commit 6da0a35 into apache:main May 4, 2026
25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci changes related to CI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Drop labels: ["triage"] from issue templates

3 participants