Skip to content

TINKERPOP-919 Added supportsDuplicateMultiProperties()#463

Merged
asfgit merged 1 commit into
tp32from
TINKERPOP-919
Oct 28, 2016
Merged

TINKERPOP-919 Added supportsDuplicateMultiProperties()#463
asfgit merged 1 commit into
tp32from
TINKERPOP-919

Conversation

@spmallette
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-919

That feature allows a graph to specify whether or not it supports multi-properties that allow the same value to be supplied on the same key. Not sure why this wasn't implemented long ago. It was relatively straightforward to put in place. I did take a look at the test suite for existing tests that might have needed this feature included, but I didn't see any.

mvn clean install -DincludeNeo4j is all good

VOTE +1

@okram
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

okram commented Oct 25, 2016

I was a confused for a bit on the method name. Seems (and this is just me) that a better name would be:

Features.supportsDuplicateMultiPropertyValues()

To me this means same key, duplicate values. The problem with "identical" is that there is no such thing as identical as properties can have meta-properties and be different. Thus, its a key/value identity, not a key/value/properties/id identity.

Dunno...whateves.

@spmallette
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

i played with a lot of different words. "duplicate" was one. i don't mind changing it if you like that better.

@spmallette spmallette changed the title TINKERPOP-919 Added supportsIdenticalMultiProperties() TINKERPOP-919 Added supportsDuplicateMultiProperties() Oct 25, 2016
@spmallette
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ok - renamed to use "duplicate" and rebased on tp32

@okram
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

okram commented Oct 26, 2016

VOTE +1

That feature allows a graph to specify whether or not it supports multi-properties that allow the same value to be supplied on the same key.
@dkuppitz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

VOTE: +1

@asfgit asfgit merged commit 3a7805c into tp32 Oct 28, 2016
@asfgit asfgit deleted the TINKERPOP-919 branch February 21, 2017 14:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants