Skip to content

Conversation

@junrushao
Copy link
Member

Additional test of #60

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @junrushao, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the test suite by adding a new test case to specifically validate the __doc__ attribute's behavior for class members. It ensures that attributes without explicitly defined documentation correctly report None for their __doc__ property, which is crucial for maintaining consistent introspection capabilities within the system. This change is an additional test related to issue #60.

Highlights

  • New Test Case: Introduced test_attribute_no_doc to verify the behavior of the __doc__ attribute for class members when documentation is not explicitly provided.
  • Docstring Verification: The new test specifically asserts that __doc__ is None for attributes (v_f64, v_str) that lack explicit documentation, while confirming existing documentation for v_i64.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a test to verify that the __doc__ attribute of an object field is None when no docstring is provided. The added test is clear and correctly validates the intended behavior. I have one minor suggestion to improve a comment for better clarity.

@junrushao junrushao force-pushed the 2025-09-26/test-doc-none branch from a41aa3c to 86cd45e Compare September 26, 2025 21:55
@junrushao junrushao requested a review from tqchen September 26, 2025 22:12
@tqchen tqchen merged commit 9b3be5d into apache:main Sep 26, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants