Skip to content

[ci] Remove commit check on ci skipping logic#10537

Merged
AndrewZhaoLuo merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
driazati:fix_skip
Mar 10, 2022
Merged

[ci] Remove commit check on ci skipping logic#10537
AndrewZhaoLuo merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
driazati:fix_skip

Conversation

@driazati
Copy link
Member

@driazati driazati commented Mar 8, 2022

The commit message check makes [skip ci] very hard to use and sometimes out of the submitter's control (e.g. when Jenkins decides to add a merge commit before running CI) for dubious benefit (the PR title is where people are looking after-the-fact anyways, so having it in the commit message doesn't make much sense). This removes the check for the commit message in order to make the process smoother.

This makes it very hard to use an sometimes out of the submitter's control (e.g. when Jenkins decides to push a merge commit before running CI) for dubious benefit (the PR title is where people are looking after-the-fact anyways, so having it in the commit message doesn't make much sense). This removes the check for the commit message in order to make the process smoother.

commit-id:dbd18808
commit-id:ecd2be81
@AndrewZhaoLuo AndrewZhaoLuo merged commit 3894991 into apache:main Mar 10, 2022
pfk-beta pushed a commit to pfk-beta/tvm that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2022
* [ci] Remove commit check on ci skipping logic

This makes it very hard to use an sometimes out of the submitter's control (e.g. when Jenkins decides to push a merge commit before running CI) for dubious benefit (the PR title is where people are looking after-the-fact anyways, so having it in the commit message doesn't make much sense). This removes the check for the commit message in order to make the process smoother.

commit-id:dbd18808

* Address comments

commit-id:ecd2be81

Co-authored-by: driazati <driazati@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants