Skip to content

docs: fix benchmark table separator column count mismatch#164

Open
membphis wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature-issue-162
Open

docs: fix benchmark table separator column count mismatch#164
membphis wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature-issue-162

Conversation

@membphis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@membphis membphis commented Jun 7, 2026

Fixes #162.

This updates malformed Markdown table separator rows in docs/benchmarks.md so their column counts match the corresponding headers. It also checks nearby benchmark tables for the same issue.

The x86_64 throughput table had an extra separator cell (8 columns vs
7 in the header), and the modify+encode table header alignment was
inconsistent (first column missing the colon suffix). Fix both so
the Markdown tables render correctly.

Fixes #162
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 7, 2026

Warning

Review limit reached

@membphis, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 39 minutes and 59 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 55cf92ac-5858-40b4-9a40-40446217b6ce

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8e1b394 and 93f7d8a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/benchmarks.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature-issue-162

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.05.

Benchmark suite Current: 93f7d8a Previous: 8e1b394 Ratio
parse_lazy/parse/wide_object 3932 ns/iter (± 30) 3478 ns/iter (± 53) 1.13
parse_lazy/parse/deep_nesting 2768 ns/iter (± 186) 2623 ns/iter (± 75) 1.06
field_access/get_f64/max_tokens 49 ns/iter (± 0) 46 ns/iter (± 0) 1.07

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

docs: fix malformed benchmark throughput table

1 participant