Skip to content

chore: update generated models from apify-docs PR #2467#764

Open
apify-service-account wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
update-models-docs-pr-2467
Open

chore: update generated models from apify-docs PR #2467#764
apify-service-account wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
update-models-docs-pr-2467

Conversation

@apify-service-account
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR updates the auto-generated Pydantic models and TypedDicts based on OpenAPI specification changes in apify-docs PR #2467.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.95%. Comparing base (2f09830) to head (dabc3b6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #764      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.68%   95.95%   +0.26%     
==========================================
  Files          48       48              
  Lines        5218     5218              
==========================================
+ Hits         4993     5007      +14     
+ Misses        225      211      -14     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 95.95% <100.00%> (+0.26%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Pijukatel Pijukatel changed the title [TODO]: update generated models from apify-docs PR #2467 chore: update generated models from apify-docs PR #2467 Apr 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants