Skip to content

Conversation

@dpeckett
Copy link
Collaborator

@dpeckett dpeckett commented Sep 11, 2025

Still some work to be done in the netlink router but the basics are coming together.

@dpeckett dpeckett requested a review from dilyevsky September 11, 2025 17:06
}
defer client.Close()

connectResp, err := client.Connect(cmd.Context())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where do we handle redundant connections? Inside client?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dpeckett dpeckett Sep 16, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You know I'd totally overlooked this, I had this broken mental model that one process -> one connection. But looking at the QUIC code I realize this was incorrect.

Thankfully icx internally has support for cryptokey routing (ala allowedips) so supporting multiple redundant connections for a single handler is really straight forward (just register a new virtual network for each with the assigned ip ranges).

Thankfully no need for seperate muxers.

@dpeckett dpeckett merged commit 10fda58 into main Sep 16, 2025
1 check passed
@dpeckett dpeckett deleted the dpeckett/tunnelv2-client branch September 16, 2025 08:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants