Vibe coding blogs(Set 1)#2527
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@atharvadeosthale has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughTwo new Markdoc blog posts were added under src/routes/blog/post.
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/routes/blog/post/best-vibe-coding-tips/+page.markdoc (1)
39-39: Add space before opening parenthesis.Standard typography convention requires a space before the opening parenthesis.
-A quick Product Requirement Document(PRD) forces you to slow down and think about what you actually want. It doesn't have to be formal or technical. Just list what success looks like at each step, like you would if you hired someone to build it for you. +A quick Product Requirement Document (PRD) forces you to slow down and think about what you actually want. It doesn't have to be formal or technical. Just list what success looks like at each step, like you would if you hired someone to build it for you.src/routes/blog/post/the-complete-vibe-coding-guide-2025/+page.markdoc (2)
109-115: Add missing spaces after list numbers for consistency.Items 3 and 4 are missing spaces after the period, while items 1 and 2 have proper spacing. Maintain consistent formatting throughout the list.
-**3.Replit** +**3. Replit**-**4.v0 by Vercel** +**4. v0 by Vercel**
146-148: Ensure consistent internal link format.Line 146 uses an absolute URL with the domain (
appwrite.io/blog/post/...), while lines 147-148 use relative paths (/blog/post/...). For consistency and maintainability, use the same format for all internal blog links (preferably relative paths).-- [Comparing the best vibe coding tools](https://appwrite.io/blog/post/comparing-vibe-coding-tools) +- [Comparing the best vibe coding tools](/blog/post/comparing-vibe-coding-tools)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
static/images/blog/best-vibe-coding-tips/cover.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngstatic/images/blog/the-complete-vibe-coding-guide-2025/cover.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/routes/blog/post/best-vibe-coding-tips/+page.markdoc(1 hunks)src/routes/blog/post/the-complete-vibe-coding-guide-2025/+page.markdoc(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/routes/blog/post/best-vibe-coding-tips/+page.markdoc (1)
106-108: <!-- [scratchpad_start]
[task review_file_1/2 review_internal_links verify_posts_structure]
Verify internal links and check if referenced posts exist[observations]
- Blog post directory contains 315 directories total
- Existing posts use kebab-case naming: "10-best-mcp-server-client", "10-git-commands-you-should-start-using", etc.
- Three referenced slugs NOT found in directory listing:
- comparing-vibe-coding-tools
- vibe-coding-security-best-practices
- choosing-the-right-ai-database
- rg error: markdoc type not recognized; need to search with different approach
- Need to check actual file being reviewed and search more broadly
[pending]
- Search for referenced slugs without file type restrictions
- View the actual file to understand full context
- Verify if links should exist or are planned
[actions]
- Run rg search without file type filter
- List contents of the file under review
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/routes/blog/post/best-vibe-coding-tips/+page.markdoc(1 hunks)src/routes/blog/post/the-complete-vibe-coding-guide-2025/+page.markdoc(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/routes/blog/post/the-complete-vibe-coding-guide-2025/+page.markdoc
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/routes/blog/post/best-vibe-coding-tips/+page.markdoc (1)
83-83: All referenced blog posts exist—links are valid.Verification confirms that all three blog posts referenced in the article exist in the repository:
/blog/post/vibe-coding-security-best-practices✓/blog/post/comparing-vibe-coding-tools✓/blog/post/choosing-the-right-ai-database✓No broken links.
3 participants
What does this PR do?
(Provide a description of what this PR does.)
Test Plan
(Write your test plan here. If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your changes work.)
Related PRs and Issues
(If this PR is related to any other PR or resolves any issue or related to any issue link all related PR and issues here.)
Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?
(Write your answer here.)
Summary by CodeRabbit