Skip to content

Conversation

@ChiragAgg5k
Copy link
Member

@ChiragAgg5k ChiragAgg5k commented Nov 25, 2025

Summary

  • Updates @appwrite/repo dependency to latest commit (aa98fbb2dc)
  • Pulls in latest API reference documentation updates

Test plan

  • Verify API reference docs are correctly updated
  • Check that the website builds successfully
  • Review any documentation changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated development dependency to a newer version.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Updates API reference documentation by pulling in the latest changes from the appwrite/appwrite repository.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates a single devDependency version reference in package.json. The @appwrite.io/repo package is pinned to a different commit hash: from 4f905e06e2e4090d38521da9c4e391553e7ac57f to aa98fbb2dc0e08def0a7cca7fe0515de643154ca. No other dependencies, scripts, or configuration changes are included.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Verify that the new commit hash corresponds to an intended update from the appwrite/appwrite repository
  • Confirm the commit is accessible and represents the desired state of the dependency

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main change: updating the @appwrite/repo dependency to a newer commit hash.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch update-repo-dependency

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 89cd54f and be2bcf4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-09-05T19:35:59.449Z
Learnt from: ebenezerdon
Repo: appwrite/website PR: 2372
File: src/routes/docs/tutorials/react-native/step-6/+page.markdoc:67-73
Timestamp: 2025-09-05T19:35:59.449Z
Learning: In React Native tutorials, the lib/appwrite.js file exports `tablesDB` (not `databases`), so imports should use `import { tablesDB } from "../lib/appwrite"` to match the export pattern established in step-3.

Applied to files:

  • package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: assets
  • GitHub Check: tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

35-35: Verify commit content and build completion.

The commit hash aa98fbb2dc0e08def0a7cca7fe0515de643154ca exists in the appwrite/appwrite repository, and the lock file has been properly updated to reflect this dependency change. However, confirm:

  1. The commit message and content align with the PR description's intent for API reference documentation updates.
  2. The build completes successfully with this updated dependency.

Since the lock file change is confirmed but the sandbox environment cannot execute the build or inspect the full commit details, manual verification of the build output is recommended before merging.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@ChiragAgg5k ChiragAgg5k merged commit e7e150c into main Nov 25, 2025
6 checks passed
@HarshMN2345 HarshMN2345 deleted the update-repo-dependency branch November 25, 2025 11:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants