-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
Feature/add mis endpoints in security #704
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
You have run out of free Bugbot PR reviews for this billing cycle. This will reset on September 28. To receive reviews on all of your PRs, visit the Cursor dashboard to activate Pro and start your 14-day free trial. |
af968af to
e3bc75f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds three new security-related administration endpoints to the ArangoDB Go driver v2: TLS data retrieval, TLS data reload, and encryption key rotation functionality.
Key changes:
- Added
GetTLSData,ReloadTLSData, andRotateEncryptionAtRestKeymethods to the ClientAdmin interface - Implemented corresponding data structures for TLS configuration and encryption key metadata
- Added comprehensive test coverage for all three endpoints with proper error handling
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| v2/arangodb/client_admin.go | Defines new interface methods and data structures for TLS and encryption operations |
| v2/arangodb/client_admin_impl.go | Implements the three new security endpoint methods with proper HTTP handling |
| v2/tests/admin_test.go | Adds comprehensive test functions with graceful error handling and validation |
| v2/CHANGELOG.md | Documents the addition of security endpoints |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
| if !strings.Contains(cert, "-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----") { | ||
| t.Logf("Warning: Certificate %d may not be in PEM format", i) | ||
| } else { | ||
| t.Logf("Certificate %d appears to be valid PEM format", i) | ||
| } |
Copilot
AI
Sep 29, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PEM format validation is overly simplistic and only checks for the BEGIN marker. Consider also checking for the corresponding END marker or use proper PEM parsing from the crypto/x509 package for more robust validation.
This PR includes the following Security - related endpoints: