Skip to content

ADBDEV-4798: Fix gprecoverseg behave test#874

Merged
KnightMurloc merged 1 commit intoadb-7.1.0from
ADBDEV-4798
Feb 28, 2024
Merged

ADBDEV-4798: Fix gprecoverseg behave test#874
KnightMurloc merged 1 commit intoadb-7.1.0from
ADBDEV-4798

Conversation

@KnightMurloc
Copy link

Fix gprecoverseg behave test

In the scenario "gprecoverseg should not give warning if pg_basebackup is
running for the up segments", after stopping the primary segments, there is no
waiting for switching to mirrors, and therefore the step "the user suspend the
walsender on the primary on content 2" fails.

This patch adds the "user can start transactions" step after stop primary
segments to wait for switching to mirrors. As is done in other scenarios.

In the scenario "gprecoverseg should not give warning if pg_basebackup is
running for the up segments", after stopping the primary segments, there is no
waiting for switching to mirrors, and therefore the step "the user suspend the
walsender on the primary on content 2" fails.

This patch adds the "user can start transactions" step after stop primary
segments to wait for switching to mirrors. As is done in other scenarios.
@BenderArenadata
Copy link

Failed job Resource group isolation tests 7: https://gitlab.adsw.io/arenadata/github_mirroring/gpdb/-/jobs/1108199

@KnightMurloc KnightMurloc marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2024 04:08
@KnightMurloc KnightMurloc merged commit 5b4bb26 into adb-7.1.0 Feb 28, 2024
@KnightMurloc KnightMurloc deleted the ADBDEV-4798 branch February 28, 2024 11:15
KnightMurloc added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2024
In the scenario "gprecoverseg should not give warning if pg_basebackup is
running for the up segments", after stopping the primary segments, there is no
waiting for switching to mirrors, and therefore the step "the user suspend the
walsender on the primary on content 2" fails.

This patch adds the "user can start transactions" step after stop primary
segments to wait for switching to mirrors. As is done in other scenarios.
KnightMurloc added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2025
In the scenario "gprecoverseg should not give warning if pg_basebackup is
running for the up segments", after stopping the primary segments, there is no
waiting for switching to mirrors, and therefore the step "the user suspend the
walsender on the primary on content 2" fails.

This patch adds the "user can start transactions" step after stop primary
segments to wait for switching to mirrors. As is done in other scenarios.
KnightMurloc added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2025
In the scenario "gprecoverseg should not give warning if pg_basebackup is
running for the up segments", after stopping the primary segments, there is no
waiting for switching to mirrors, and therefore the step "the user suspend the
walsender on the primary on content 2" fails.

This patch adds the "user can start transactions" step after stop primary
segments to wait for switching to mirrors. As is done in other scenarios.
KnightMurloc added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2025
In the scenario "gprecoverseg should not give warning if pg_basebackup is
running for the up segments", after stopping the primary segments, there is no
waiting for switching to mirrors, and therefore the step "the user suspend the
walsender on the primary on content 2" fails.

This patch adds the "user can start transactions" step after stop primary
segments to wait for switching to mirrors. As is done in other scenarios.
KnightMurloc added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2025
In the scenario "gprecoverseg should not give warning if pg_basebackup is
running for the up segments", after stopping the primary segments, there is no
waiting for switching to mirrors, and therefore the step "the user suspend the
walsender on the primary on content 2" fails.

This patch adds the "user can start transactions" step after stop primary
segments to wait for switching to mirrors. As is done in other scenarios.
KnightMurloc added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2025
In the scenario "gprecoverseg should not give warning if pg_basebackup is
running for the up segments", after stopping the primary segments, there is no
waiting for switching to mirrors, and therefore the step "the user suspend the
walsender on the primary on content 2" fails.

This patch adds the "user can start transactions" step after stop primary
segments to wait for switching to mirrors. As is done in other scenarios.

(cherry picked from commit e38f572)
KnightMurloc added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2025
In the scenario "gprecoverseg should not give warning if pg_basebackup is
running for the up segments", after stopping the primary segments, there is no
waiting for switching to mirrors, and therefore the step "the user suspend the
walsender on the primary on content 2" fails.

This patch adds the "user can start transactions" step after stop primary
segments to wait for switching to mirrors. As is done in other scenarios.

(cherry picked from commit e38f572)
KnightMurloc added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2025
In the scenario "gprecoverseg should not give warning if pg_basebackup is
running for the up segments", after stopping the primary segments, there is no
waiting for switching to mirrors, and therefore the step "the user suspend the
walsender on the primary on content 2" fails.

This patch adds the "user can start transactions" step after stop primary
segments to wait for switching to mirrors. As is done in other scenarios.

(cherry picked from commit e38f572)
KnightMurloc added a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2025
In the scenario "gprecoverseg should not give warning if pg_basebackup is
running for the up segments", after stopping the primary segments, there is no
waiting for switching to mirrors, and therefore the step "the user suspend the
walsender on the primary on content 2" fails.

This patch adds the "user can start transactions" step after stop primary
segments to wait for switching to mirrors. As is done in other scenarios.

(cherry picked from commit e38f572)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants