Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 31, 2019. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@ahmetb
Copy link
Contributor

@ahmetb ahmetb commented Sep 2, 2015

Fixes the Dockerfile issue in PR #79's CI.

cc: @PeterJausovec @kichalla

@ahmetb ahmetb mentioned this pull request Sep 2, 2015
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since all the samples(including older beta versions with their own respective dnx . kestrel) in the home repo have their own Dockerfile, I think the we can modify this line to be dnx kestrel instead as going forward this is going to be the way to run.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kichalla problem is, if you actually checkout to 1.0.0-beta4 tag for instance, they don't have dockerfiles: https://github.com/aspnet/Home/tree/v1.0.0-beta4/samples/1.0.0-beta4 yet we build them in the CI as well...

So keeping this should be making sense as it injects dockerfiles to old versions where it has to be "dnx . kestrel"...

Maybe it's time for us to retire all those old versions (beta1-2-3-4) today and get going with the newer ones. This could clarify and make the CI scripts a lot precise.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, got it.

@ahmetb
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahmetb commented Sep 2, 2015

CI is currently failing for beta4 (could be flakiness).

@ahmetb
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahmetb commented Sep 2, 2015

Looks like in the beta4 (and possibly for the upper versions) the container starts (prints "Started") but exits immediately.... Investigating...

@kichalla
Copy link
Member

kichalla commented Sep 2, 2015

:shipit:

@ahmetb
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahmetb commented Sep 2, 2015

CI failed again... I'm keeping adding debug stmts to see what's going wrong. Feel free to merge the open PR if you feel confident.

@ahmetb
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahmetb commented Sep 2, 2015

Heh, worked this time dunno why.

Excluding beta4 from the CI.

@ahmetb ahmetb changed the title Use existing sample Dockerfiles in CI Use existing sample Dockerfiles in CI. Remove beta4 from CI Sep 2, 2015
ahmetb added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2015
Use existing sample Dockerfiles in CI. Remove beta4 from CI
@ahmetb ahmetb merged commit 45f3251 into aspnet:master Sep 2, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants