This commit prepares assume to integrate proper nodal pricing

[nick-harder]

-delete old examplery nodal pricing
-it will be replaced with pypsa model similar to redispatch
-provide better description and structure for markets API documentation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 8.03571% with 103 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.42%. Comparing base (5e8cbf4) to head (f4e4d0c).

Files	Patch %	Lines
...ssume/markets/clearing_algorithms/nodal_pricing.py	4.22%	68 Missing ⚠️
assume/common/grid_utils.py	0.00%	22 Missing ⚠️
assume/markets/clearing_algorithms/redispatch.py	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
assume/strategies/naive_strategies.py	44.44%	5 Missing ⚠️
assume/markets/clearing_algorithms/__init__.py	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #304      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.45%   77.42%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          43       43              
  Lines        5016     4996      -20     
==========================================
- Hits         3885     3868      -17     
+ Misses       1131     1128       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytest	77.42% <8.03%> (-0.04%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[nick-harder]

@maurerle could you please take a look at this PR?

[maurerle]

I don't really see the reason in removing things without replacing them with better things, while we have a differen WIP PR open which improves this?

[nick-harder]

@maurerle I have now added the new nodal clearing similar to redispatch structure, but without all the extra funcitons. it uses the same input data and same example folder. Please take a look

[maurerle]

The merge conflicts need to be resolved here.

[nick-harder]

@maurerle yeah, this one has to be significantly changed to be in line with the new version. I will work on it this week (hopefully) and let you know

[maurerle]

I would like to have closer look at the example when I have time, but so far it looks good