Formatting and linting#2
Open
workingjubilee wants to merge 2 commits intoatomicincrement:feature/libmfrom
Open
Formatting and linting#2workingjubilee wants to merge 2 commits intoatomicincrement:feature/libmfrom
workingjubilee wants to merge 2 commits intoatomicincrement:feature/libmfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These are just generated formatting issues and clippy complaints. I don't know if they're all valid/correct: I mean, the first commit is purely formatting issues, but the second commit includes mostly clippy lints which are more... overzealous and some might of them might be wrong, so I am happy to overlook them if they are. You don't have to fix the clippy lints per se for things to land, but something has to be adjusted, either us allowing clippy's warnings or whatever.