Skip to content

Retain OTP29 Recs chunks#63

Merged
UncleGrumpy merged 1 commit into
atomvm:masterfrom
pguyot:w20/otp29-native-records
May 16, 2026
Merged

Retain OTP29 Recs chunks#63
UncleGrumpy merged 1 commit into
atomvm:masterfrom
pguyot:w20/otp29-native-records

Conversation

@pguyot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@pguyot pguyot commented May 16, 2026

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Paul Guyot <pguyot@kallisys.net>
@UncleGrumpy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Do you think this should have a test added before we merge?

@pguyot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

pguyot commented May 16, 2026

I can write a test that verifies this is indeed the name of the chunk OTP29 emits but is it over-engineering?

@UncleGrumpy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

UncleGrumpy commented May 16, 2026

I can write a test that verifies this is indeed the name of the chunk OTP29 emits but is it over-engineering?

That’s why I asked you, I don’t think we really need a test for this now. I was just thinking about catching any regression in the future that might cause the chunks to be excluded. But again that is probably unlikely and can be dealt with later if a problem does arise.

@UncleGrumpy UncleGrumpy merged commit ee5527b into atomvm:master May 16, 2026
10 checks passed
@pguyot pguyot deleted the w20/otp29-native-records branch May 16, 2026 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants