Raise exceptions in resolveCredentials instead of creation for StsWebIdentityTokenFileCredentialsProvider

[alextwoods]

Raise exceptions in resolveCredentials instead of creation for StsWebIdentityTokenFileCredentialsProvider

Motivation and Context

• Fixes StsWebIdentityTokenFileCredentialsProvider should not throw on missing web identity token file #6529
• Fixes Don't Throw at Construction Time for StsWebIdentityTokenFileCredentialsProvider #3952

Unlike other credential providers, the StsWebIdentityTokenFileCredentialsProvider was previously raising exceptions during construction instead of when resolveCredentials was called - this impacts its usage in a credentials provider chain. The logic to capture exceptions during construction exited previously, but the scope was not wide enough.

Modifications

• Expand the existing try to cover all of the places in construction where exceptions are raised.

Testing

New unit tests

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
• Local run of mvn install succeeds
• My code follows the code style of this project
• My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
• I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
• I have added tests to cover my changes
• All new and existing tests passed
• I have added a changelog entry. Adding a new entry must be accomplished by running the scripts/new-change script and following the instructions. Commit the new file created by the script in .changes/next-release with your changes.
• My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

• I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
82.4% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

This pull request has been closed and the conversation has been locked. Comments on closed PRs are hard for our team to see. If you need more assistance, please open a new issue that references this one.