Address runBlocking in nested STS credential provider translation

[kggilmer]

There is PR feedback to change how CompletableFuture is handled in a nested credential provider. This issue is to track updating the alternative approach until the test case mentioned in the notes is able to pass.

[github-actions]

⚠️COMMENT VISIBILITY WARNING⚠️

Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see.
If you need more assistance, please either tag a team member or open a new issue that references this one.
If you wish to keep having a conversation with other community members under this issue feel free to do so.