Skip to content

Conversation

@kggilmer
Copy link
Contributor

@kggilmer kggilmer commented Nov 16, 2021

Companion PR: smithy-lang/smithy-kotlin#534

Issue #

smithy-lang/smithy-kotlin#532

Description of changes

  • Refactoring and cleanup resulting of removing java builder in request types. See companion PR for additional details.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@github-actions
Copy link

A new generated diff is ready to view: __generated-main...__generated-refactor-remove-java-builders

@kggilmer kggilmer requested review from aajtodd and ianbotsf November 16, 2021 01:59
@kggilmer kggilmer marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2021 01:59
@kggilmer kggilmer requested a review from a team as a code owner November 16, 2021 01:59
@github-actions
Copy link

A new generated diff is ready to view: __generated-main...__generated-refactor-remove-java-builders

writer.withBlock("companion object {", "}") {
withBlock(
"operator fun invoke(sharedConfig: #T? = null, block: Config.DslBuilder.() -> Unit = {}): #L {",
"operator fun invoke(sharedConfig: #T? = null, block: Config.Builder.() -> Unit = {}): #L {",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same question as sibling PR, should these be inline?

override fun credentialsProvider(credentialsProvider: CredentialsProvider): FluentBuilder = apply { this.credentialsProvider = credentialsProvider }
override fun endpointResolver(endpointResolver: AwsEndpointResolver): FluentBuilder = apply { this.endpointResolver = endpointResolver }
override fun region(region: String): FluentBuilder = apply { this.region = region }
fun build(): TestPresignConfig = TestPresignConfig(this)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be internal?

@github-actions
Copy link

A new generated diff is ready to view: __generated-main...__generated-refactor-remove-java-builders

@github-actions
Copy link

A new generated diff is ready to view: __generated-main...__generated-refactor-remove-java-builders

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link

A new generated diff is ready to view: __generated-main...__generated-refactor-remove-java-builders

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@github-actions
Copy link

A new generated diff is ready to view: __generated-main...__generated-refactor-remove-java-builders

@kggilmer kggilmer merged commit dd8af57 into main Nov 18, 2021
@kggilmer kggilmer deleted the refactor-remove-java-builders branch November 18, 2021 21:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants