Skip to content

Conversation

@aajtodd
Copy link
Contributor

@aajtodd aajtodd commented Aug 31, 2022

Issue #

#543
sibling: smithy-lang/smithy-kotlin#696

Description of changes

Use an explicit scope for launching background request work

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@aajtodd aajtodd requested review from ianbotsf and lucix-aws August 31, 2022 20:00
@aajtodd aajtodd requested a review from a team as a code owner August 31, 2022 20:00
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@aajtodd aajtodd mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2022
16 tasks
@github-actions
Copy link

A new generated diff is ready to view: __generated-main...__generated-explicit-scope

Comment on lines 77 to 79
writer.write("")
writer.write("return messages.#T()", AwsRuntimeTypes.AwsEventStream.asEventStreamHttpBody)
writer.write("return messages.#T(context)", AwsRuntimeTypes.AwsEventStream.asEventStreamHttpBody)
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Question: I'd normally expect a generator change to break some unit tests. Do we not have unit tests for this code?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have codegen integration tests for event streams

@aajtodd aajtodd merged commit 1ffaf31 into main Sep 1, 2022
@aajtodd aajtodd deleted the explicit-scope branch September 1, 2022 16:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants