Skip to content

Test missing handling in GLM#699

Merged
dominikbach merged 4 commits intodevelopfrom
missing-glm
Jun 3, 2024
Merged

Test missing handling in GLM#699
dominikbach merged 4 commits intodevelopfrom
missing-glm

Conversation

@dominikbach
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes #346 .

The root cause for this issue is still unknown. Here I implemented a more rigorous test of which conditions are excluded; this test is passed.

Also added a slight improvement to NaN reporting by removing the impact of shiftbf parameter (which will introduce NaNs in the shift period).

@dominikbach dominikbach self-assigned this Apr 26, 2024
@dominikbach dominikbach added the In Progress Currently being worked on label Apr 26, 2024
@dominikbach dominikbach added Completed & Waiting for Review Completed and waiting for review and removed In Progress Currently being worked on labels May 28, 2024
@dominikbach dominikbach requested a review from teddphil May 28, 2024 16:04
@teddphil teddphil added Approved The pull request has been approved and can be checked and then merged. and removed Completed & Waiting for Review Completed and waiting for review labels Jun 3, 2024
@dominikbach dominikbach merged commit 25c2cd4 into develop Jun 3, 2024
@dominikbach dominikbach deleted the missing-glm branch June 3, 2024 12:58
@teddphil teddphil removed the Approved The pull request has been approved and can be checked and then merged. label Jun 24, 2024
@teddphil teddphil added this to the v7.0 milestone Aug 25, 2024
@teddphil teddphil mentioned this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PsPM GLM for PS: exclude_missing settings

2 participants