blog: Barbacane vs Portkey/LiteLLM comparison (replaces #12)#17
Merged
Conversation
Restores the comparison article that was sitting on a stale branch (originally PR #12), rebased onto current main with the two internal /mcp/ links repointed to /ai/ following the Apr 23 unification, and publishDate refreshed to today. Fixes the dangling /blog/barbacane-vs-portkey-litellm/ link from src/pages/ai.astro:510 (the FAQ "How is this different from Portkey or LiteLLM?" answer), which was the source of one of the 404s in the current GSC coverage report.
This was referenced May 18, 2026
4 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
blog/barbacane-vs-portkey-litellm(PR blog: Barbacane vs Portkey and LiteLLM comparison #12, opened Apr 29). That branch was forked before the Apr 23/ai/+/platform/repositioning and rebasing it would revert most of last month's work, so this is a fresh branch off currentmaincarrying just the article./mcp/internal links inside the article: now point to/ai/.publishDateto today (2026-05-18)./blog/barbacane-vs-portkey-litellm/link from src/pages/ai.astro:510, which was one of the two 404s flagged by the current Google Search Console coverage report.Closes #12 once merged.
Test plan
/blog/barbacane-vs-portkey-litellm//blog/index list/ai/FAQ "How is this different from Portkey or LiteLLM?" link/sitemap-0.xml) contains the new URL/og-image.png)