Replace yay with paru#43
Conversation
|
Appreciate this, but I actually really like the idea that yay is feature complete and not under further development. I have more than a few bones to pick with package managers that keep "evolving" after they've solved their primary problem. So unless someone presents very compelling arguments for why paru would be a big upgrade, I'd prefer to stick with yay. |
i do have some comment on this. paru has an automatic review feature that shows you the PKGBUILDs for each package you're about to install. in combination with the sure, it has colored diffs like some people have mentioned, but the most important thing is the mindset shift. users should be paying far more attention to what is in the packages they're installing than the |
|
i ran into this while trying to integrate the some examples of these attacks include this one on firefox, librewolf and zen, as well as a similar attack on |
paru for AUR?
Sorry if this has already been discussed - and maybe there are solid reasons why
yaywas the chosen AUR helper.Buuut… the original maintainer of
yayhas moved on and createdparu.See the Reddit post here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/jjn1c1/paru_v100_and_stepping_away_from_yay/
I’d suggest that Omarchy switch to
paru.And if the name change feels too disruptive:
alias yay=paru😇