-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 169
Description
Problem
write_note silently overwrites existing notes with the same title. This is dangerous for agents that accumulate content in files (daily notes, logs, journals). An agent calling write_note on a file that already exists loses all prior content.
Real-world example: an agent ran write_note on a daily memory file during reflection, destroying a full day of accumulated notes.
Proposal
Add an optional overwrite parameter (default: true for backwards compat):
overwrite: true— current behavior (create or replace)overwrite: false— error if the note already exists
Alternatively, or additionally:
mode: "create" | "update" | "upsert"for more granular control- Return a warning/diff when overwriting a note that has changed since last read
Workaround
Agents should use edit_note with operation: "append" for any file that accumulates content. But the footgun remains for any agent that doesn't know this.
Context
The MCP write_note tool is the most natural first choice for agents — it's what they reach for. Making the destructive path require explicit opt-in would prevent data loss.