Skip to content

docs: correct stale bm_* tool count in README#7

Merged
groksrc merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-tool-count
May 18, 2026
Merged

docs: correct stale bm_* tool count in README#7
groksrc merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-tool-count

Conversation

@groksrc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@groksrc groksrc commented May 18, 2026

Summary

The README's tool surface drifted out of sync with the code:

  • Intro said "seven bm_* tools" → now ten
  • "What the agent gets" header said "Eight tools" → now Ten
  • The table listed 8 and omitted bm_projects and bm_workspaces → both rows added
  • Added a one-line note that read/write tools accept optional project / project_id for per-call routing (shipped in 0.3.0, never reflected in the README)

Actual surface: bm_search, bm_read, bm_write, bm_edit, bm_context, bm_delete, bm_move, bm_recent (0.2.0), bm_projects, bm_workspaces (0.3.0) = 10.

Verified against __init__.py _HERMES_TO_BM / TOOL_SCHEMAS on main. Docs-only; no code or test changes.

Test plan

  • No code changes — README prose only.
  • Grep confirms no remaining stale "seven"/"eight tools" claims.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The intro said "seven bm_* tools" and the "What the agent gets"
header said "Eight tools"; the table listed 8 and omitted
bm_projects and bm_workspaces. Actual surface is 10 (bm_recent
landed in 0.2.0, bm_projects/bm_workspaces in 0.3.0).

Corrects both counts to ten, adds the two missing tool rows, and
adds a one-line note that read/write tools accept optional
project / project_id for per-call routing (shipped in 0.3.0 but
never reflected in the README).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@groksrc groksrc merged commit a9cabea into main May 18, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant