Currently the py_console_script_binary is building a full runfiles tree and for the usecase that you are implementing in here - a py_binary is just calling utilities within the same venv that is a little bit too heavy. I want to separate the usecases for py_console_script_binary to be only something where we actually want to build a full separate venv for the said scripts.
Ah, I think I get what you mean. Do you want to file an issue for further discussion? entrypoints/scripts/things-in-bin seem distinct enough they warrant something in a provider, but it's not clear to me how a consumer can make effective use of it via a py_binary.
Originally posted by @rickeylev in #3743 (comment)
Ah, I think I get what you mean. Do you want to file an issue for further discussion? entrypoints/scripts/things-in-bin seem distinct enough they warrant something in a provider, but it's not clear to me how a consumer can make effective use of it via a py_binary.
Originally posted by @rickeylev in #3743 (comment)