Updated reconsiderationsupplem...

[tekarrawilkinson]

Adding reconsiderationsupplem....

Review: https://brms-simulator.apps.silver.devops.gov.bc.ca/rule/67a3ba4df4b90d1b9cdcb88c?version=inReview

[sbuhovac]

I did an intial Validation Testing and here's my feedback:

• Input "Assistance Eligibility Type" should be updated to include supplements with IA and DA. In other words, that LOV should say "Income or Disability Assistance or supplement"
• What is the intent of the date input field "Discontinuation or Reduction Date"? Regardless of which date I choose, I get the same output result.

@tekarrawilkinson to review.

[tekarrawilkinson]

Input "Assistance Eligibility Type" should be updated to include supplements with IA and DA. In other words, that LOV should say "Income or Disability Assistance or supplement"

- this rule is built based on the map (https://www.figma.com/board/yFn6RADzzlzOmXwSPT1btu/Reconsideration-supplement?node-id=0-1&p=f&t=ebag7g6DqNahZdCq-0) which includes a statement of whether the case is IA DA or HA, so that discussion would be with policy/mapping to change.

What is the intent of the date input field "Discontinuation or Reduction Date"? Regardless of which date I choose, I get the same output result.

- this input references the point on the map that the Reconsideration branch has made a decision, which means this date is "not null" and used as a date point

[prchristenson]

@tekarrawilkinson Map has been updated to reflect changes agreed to at Mar 20th collab session. Please tag testers when edits have been complete. Thanks. (https://www.figma.com/board/yFn6RADzzlzOmXwSPT1btu/Reconsideration-supplement?node-id=0-1&p=f&t=ebag7g6DqNahZdCq-0)

[brysonjbest]

@prchristenson @sbuhovac @cevenden Rule updated to reflect the current version of the map. New input field added that considers type of assistance. This is broken down into three categories for the purpose of this rule: Support/Shelter, Supplement - Eligible Reconsideration, Supplement - Ineligible Reconsideration. This covers whether a supplement is reconsideration eligible. The actual breakdown of what is considered reconsideration eligible is considered a BP as per the map, so this method was chosen as the most simplistic while covering the different scenarios.

[cevenden]

Updated Recon rules look great, see feedback from Sasha for label suggestion on Assistance Type. Suggest "Discontinued/Reduced Assistance Type" as label for clarity, but optional at this time. Otherwise passed and approved Validation Testing.

[sbuhovac]

Updated rule looks good as now we have two inputs, one for assistance type in receipt and the other for assistance type reduced. The only minor (optional) feedback is to add one more word to better clarify that the current input "Assistance Type" is referring to discontinued/reduced assistance by calling it "DIscontinued/Reduced Assistance Type". Regardless, we are passing this validation testing.
@brysonjbest

[sbuhovac]

Now that we passed this Reconsideration Supplement validation testing, the same update should be done to the Appeals Supplement rule.
@brysonjbest

[brysonjbest]

@sbuhovac @cevenden Updated with the suggested name, as it provides helpful clarification.

[cevenden]

Approved Isolation testing.

[sbuhovac]

Isolation testing passed.
reconsiderations-appeal_reconsiderationsupplement_testing_minValue_0_maxValue_1000_minValue_2025-04-01_maxValue_2025-04-01reconsiderationsupplem..._2025-04-03T22-46-45Z.csv