[MDS-6629] Mines Act Application uploaders

[taraepp]

Objective

• basically add a subcategory to mines act applications

KNOWN ISSUE

• gosh I really don't like how we have those xref objects attached to mine documents that sometimes has category info, but also sometimes it's somewhere else completely different (without a consistent name!)
• but it felt seriously out of scope to fix it
• Suggestion for the future: rework mine document BE & FE
  • all those object_xref with object_type_code properties? That only show up for archived documents? category_code. Put it in a hybrid property. Return a simpler object. Have another one that indicates the object type if necessary.
  • and then same for returning major mine application documents- use those same property names so it's like object_code: MMA, category_code: APX, subtype_code: BIF
  • so we can treat all documents the same, but also know what kind of document it is when we need to filter
  • I wrote some really gnarly code and I was not happy about it. It works, but...

MDS-6629

Why are you making this change? Provide a short explanation and/or screenshots

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed for 'bcgov-sonarcloud_mds_minespace-web'

Failed conditions
60.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed for 'bcgov-sonarcloud_mds_common'

Failed conditions
78.6% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)
42.5% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed for 'bcgov-sonarcloud_mds_core-web'

Failed conditions
75.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed for 'bcgov-sonarcloud_mds_core-api'

Failed conditions
71.9% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud