Benchmarks

Benchmarks

GoldenMatch is benchmarked against the University of Leipzig entity resolution benchmark datasets.

Leipzig Benchmark Results

Best Results Per Dataset

Dataset	Records	Best Strategy	Precision	Recall	F1	Time
DBLP-ACM	2.6K vs 2.3K	Vertex AI embeddings	97.5%	97.3%	97.4%	119s
DBLP-Scholar	2.6K vs 64K	multi-pass + fuzzy	67.2%	84.1%	74.7%	83.9s
Abt-Buy	1K vs 1K	Vertex AI embeddings	85.5%	83.9%	84.7%	53s
Amazon-Google	1.4K vs 3.2K	Vertex AI embeddings	60.6%	56.8%	58.6%	110s

Previous bests (without Vertex AI): DBLP-ACM 97.2% (multi-pass), Abt-Buy 59.5% (LLM boost), Amazon-Google 40.5% (rec_emb). Vertex AI's text-embedding-004 provides dramatically better embeddings for product matching.

Comparison with Other Tools

Tool	DBLP-ACM	Abt-Buy	Approach	Training Required
GoldenMatch	97.4%	84.7%	Vertex AI embeddings (zero-config)	No
Ditto	99.0%	89.3%	Fine-tuned DistilBERT	Yes (1000+ labels)
DeepMatcher	98.4%	62.8%	Deep learning	Yes
Splink	~95%	~70%	Fellegi-Sunter (Spark)	Yes (labels)
dedupe	~96%	~75%	Active learning	Yes (200+ labels)
Zingg	~96%	~80%	Active learning (Spark)	Yes (labels)

Key Findings

• DBLP-ACM (97.4%): Within 1.6pts of Ditto with zero training — competitive with state-of-the-art.
• Abt-Buy (84.7%): Vertex AI's text-embedding-004 closed most of the gap with Ditto (89.3%). Previously 59.5% with LLM boost on local MiniLM.
• Amazon-Google (58.6%): 45% relative improvement over previous best (40.5%). Product matching with very different naming conventions remains hard across all tools.
• DBLP-Scholar (74.7%): Multi-pass blocking + fuzzy scoring. Not yet tested with Vertex AI.

See Comparison with Other Tools for a full feature-by-feature breakdown.

Throughput (Scale Curve)

Measured on a laptop (17GB RAM, no GPU) with exact + fuzzy matching, blocking, clustering, and golden record generation:

Records	Time	Throughput	Pairs Found	Memory
1,000	0.2s	5,500 rec/s	210	101 MB
10,000	1.4s	7,300 rec/s	7,000	123 MB
100,000	12s	8,200 rec/s	571,000	544 MB

Near-linear scaling: throughput stays consistent as data grows. Memory usage scales linearly.

Pipeline Bottlenecks (at 100K records)

Stage	Time	% of Total
Fuzzy matching	5.6s	45%
Golden records	4.0s	33%
Blocking	2.0s	16%
Clustering	0.5s	4%
Auto-fix + standardize	0.1s	1%
Matchkeys + exact match	0.1s	1%

The bottleneck is fuzzy NxN scoring within blocks (RapidFuzz cdist). Coarser blocking keys = faster but lower recall. Fine blocking keys = slower but higher recall.

1M Record Benchmark (Exact Only)

With exact matching only (no fuzzy), 1M records process in ~15 seconds:

138,730 duplicate clusters found with 100% precision and 100% recall.

Large Datasets (1M+)

For datasets exceeding available memory, use database sync mode:

goldenmatch sync --table customers --connection-string "$DB" --config config.yaml

Processes in chunks, maintains persistent ANN index, matches incrementally. Tested to 10M+ records in Postgres.

Throughput Comparison

Tool	Throughput	Hardware Required
GoldenMatch	8,200 rec/s	Laptop (no GPU)
dedupe	~500 rec/s	Laptop
Splink	~50,000 rec/s	Spark cluster
Zingg	~30,000 rec/s	Spark cluster

GoldenMatch is the fastest single-machine deduplication tool. Splink and Zingg are faster but require distributed Spark clusters.

LLM Boost Results

Simulated with ground truth labels (5% noise to approximate LLM accuracy):

Dataset	Zero-Shot	LLM Boost (300 labels)	Improvement	Cost
DBLP-ACM	94.8%	96.6%	+1.8pts	~$0.30
Abt-Buy	44.5%	59.5%	+15pts	~$0.30

The optimal configuration: MiniLM base model, 300 labels, 3 epochs, train on multi-pass pairs, score on ANN pairs.