This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 30, 2026. It is now read-only.
[Backlog Discovery] feat(backlog): scheduled-workflow-jitter-throttling#110
Open
[Backlog Discovery] feat(backlog): scheduled-workflow-jitter-throttling#110
Conversation
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[Backlog Discovery]
Reviewer: Product Manager
- Acceptance criteria says apply jitter/throttling to “all schedule workflows” but doesn’t define scope or opt-out, which risks impacting critical workflows; specify which workflows are in-scope and add an explicit opt-out/override rule.
- Core scenario mentions keeping manual triggers, but acceptance criteria doesn’t guarantee manual runs bypass throttling; add a criterion that
workflow_dispatchexecutions are never delayed/skipped (or define when they are).
|
[Reviewer Workflow] 需求价值评估
价值点
风险与建议
|
|
[Product Designer] @bestony 当前需求分析中存在待确认问题,请在本 Issue 回复:
来源文档: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[Backlog Discovery]
Reviewer: Product Manager
- Scope definition is missing: the requirement does not list which schedule workflows are in-scope, making it hard to assess impact and opt-out rules. Suggest adding a concrete workflow list (names/paths) and any known exclusions.
- Baseline evidence is marked “待补充”, but acceptance requires 30‑day delay/queue/runtime/cost metrics to validate value. Suggest filling in the metrics now or explicitly stating a data collection plan with owner and timeline before moving forward.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[Backlog Discovery]
Reviewer: Product Manager
- Requirement priority is inconsistent: PR context states P2 while the requirement file sets P3, which affects planning and execution urgency. Suggest align the priority in the requirement file with the PR context (or update the PR context if P3 is correct) and note the rationale.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[Backlog Discovery]
backlog/20260221075326-scheduled-workflow-jitter-throttling.mdscheduled-workflow-jitter-throttling[Backlog Discovery]
Update Record 2026-02-21 16:11:09 +08:00
Update summary:
Polished core scenarios with consistent sentence punctuation.
Added user problems calling out missing 30-day delay/queue/runtime evidence and unclear throttling conditions.
Added an external research placeholder for internal Actions usage/queue metrics to quantify impact.
Expanded proposed solution to include scoped config, explicit throttling conditions with fallback rules, and a manual dispatch bypass.
Reworked acceptance criteria to define scope/opt-out rules, manual dispatch exceptions, and required 30-day baseline metrics before launch.
Status: committed
Commit:
f1258c7d093bdf66cb0f7947d2f754bfe27020e6Trigger: issue_comment.edited
Comment: [Backlog Discovery] feat(backlog): scheduled-workflow-jitter-throttling #110 (comment)
Actor: @github-actions[bot]
Updated At (Asia/Shanghai): 2026-02-21 16:11:09 +08:00
[Backlog Discovery]
Update Record 2026-02-21 16:14:11 +08:00
Update summary:
Lowered backlog priority from P2 to P3, aligning both frontmatter and priority section.
Clarified that internal repository metrics are planned, assigning the maintainer a deadline to add 30-day schedule delay, queue time, runtime, and cost share baselines.
Defined the initial in-scope scheduled workflows for jitter/throttling with an explicit opt-in requirement for others.
Tightened acceptance criteria wording for the scope definition without changing requirements.
Status: committed
Commit:
e0e8d427e8bb23184fa459bf5a183c6b05e6c006Trigger: workflow_run.completed
Comment: https://github.com/bestony/self/actions/runs/22253370595
Actor: @github-actions[bot]
Updated At (Asia/Shanghai): 2026-02-21 16:14:11 +08:00
[Backlog Discovery]
Update Record 2026-02-21 16:16:33 +08:00
Update summary:
Reviewed trusted feedback and current PR content; no document update was needed.
Status: no_change
Commit:
N/ATrigger: workflow_run.completed
Comment: https://github.com/bestony/self/actions/runs/22253411285
Actor: @github-actions[bot]
Updated At (Asia/Shanghai): 2026-02-21 16:16:33 +08:00